Assessment of the Diagnosis-To-Needle Times for Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department with Acute ST- Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction


DOI: 10.2478/jce-2024-0009

ABSTRACT

Background: Coronary artery disease is one of the most common causes of death in the world. The outcome of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction is influenced by many fac- tors, and the time elapsed from symptom onset to diagnosis and reperfusion have a critical role in this regard. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in the diag- nosis-to-needle times of patients with STEMI presenting to the hospital during and outside of working hours, and the effect of this relationship on in-hospital clinical events. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the data of 50 patients admitted for emergency primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We assessed pain onset-to-diagnosis times and diag- nosis-to-needle times, and evaluated their relationship with troponin values at admission and after 48 h. Results: The mean age of the patients was 55.64 ± 13.72 years. In total, 60% of the patients presented outside of working hours. Mean patient delay time from the onset of chest pain to seeking medical help was 2.64 ± 2.47 h. Mean troponin values were 4.39 ± 5.26 ng/ml at admission and 36.50 ± 12.95 ng/ml after 48 h. Mean post-angiography ejection fraction values were 47.36 ± 6.53%. We found a statistically significant difference in the pain onset-to-diagnosis and diagnosis-to-needle times of patients who presented to the hospital during and outside of working hours. We found a positive correlation between diagnosis- to-needle times and the troponin values of patients, and a statistically significant differ- ence between pain onset-to-diagnosis times of patients who presented during and outside of working hours (p < 0.05). Although the relationship between the diagnosis-to-needle time and troponin elevation after 48 h was strong (97%), the relationship between pain onset-to- diagnosis time and troponin elevation after 48 h was weak (8%), suggesting that the duration of surgical intervention is much more important than the time until the first medical contact. Conclusions: In this study, there was a statistically significant difference in the pain onset- to-diagnosis and diagnosis-to-needle times of patients who presented to the hospital during and outside of working hours.